nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2021, 04, v.19 51-55+7
基于多源数据的梅州市旅游资源综合评价分析
基金项目(Foundation): 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD19CGL36); 梅州市科技局与嘉应学院联合重点项目(2013KJZ08); 嘉应学院大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S201910582084)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

旅游大数据对旅游者的行为模式的影响日趋明显,在分析研究区旅游资源现状基础上,利用传统数据和网络数据,选取4个一级因子和8个分级指标,构建梅州市旅游资源综合评价体系,对梅州市旅游资源进行综合评价分析。结果表明梅州市旅游资源北密南疏,具有从城市中心向各县市递减的趋势,其中218个旅游点综合评价得分在0~0.7之间,集中分布在0.1~0.2间,自然类的旅游资源高分的景点所占比重最多。基于评价得分核密度分析的旅游资源也具有空间差异性,自然类景观的综合评价得分呈多格局分布特性,人文类和休闲类的旅游资源综合评价得分的空间格局为单一中心格局。梅州市旅游资源及其评价得分具有空间分异特征,建议各类景点发挥协同组团的优势,优化旅游资源发展空间格局,将梅州市建造成世界客家文化旅游休闲目的地,并对同类型城市旅游资源发展规划提供借鉴。

Abstract:

The influence of tourism big data on the behavior patterns of tourists is becoming more and more obvious.Based on the current situation analysis of tourism resources in the study area,using multi-source data,we selected four first-level factors and eight grading indicators to construct Meizhou tourism comprehensive resource evaluation system,and analyzed the comprehensive evaluation of tourism resources in Meizhou City.The results show that the tourism resources of Meizhou City are dense in the north and sparse in the south,with a trend of decreasing from the city center to the counties.The comprehensive evaluation scores of 218 tourist attractions are between 0 and0.7,which are concentrated in the range of 0.1 to 0.2.Highly rated natural tourist attractions have the higher proportion.The tourism resources based on the evaluation value core density analysis also have spatial differences.The comprehensive evaluation value of natural landscapes has a multi-pattern distribution characteristic,and the spatial pattern of the comprehensive evaluation value of tourism resources for humanities and leisure are a single center pattern.Meizhou' s tourism resources and their evaluation values have the characteristics of spatial differentiation.It is recommended that various attractions should take advantage of collaborative groupings,optimize the spatial pattern of tourism resources development,and build Meizhou City into a worldwide Hakka cultural tourism and leisure destination,which can provide reference for the development of tourism resources of similar cities.

参考文献

[1]曾忠禄,王兴.大数据在旅游研究中的运用——国际文献研究[J/OL].情报杂志:1-5[2020-07-28]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1167.G3.20200722.0958.016.html.

[2]赵磊,丁烨,杨宏浩.浙江省旅游景区空间分布差异化研究[J].经济地理,2013,33(9):177-183

[3]黄葵.旅游资源与旅游空间整合开发策略研究——以重庆市大南山风景区旅游规划为例[J].重庆教育学院学报,2012,25(6):76-78

[4]舒惠芳,李萍,江玲.基于GIS的深圳旅游资源评价与区划[J].热带地理,2010,30(2):205-209

[5]敬峰瑞.基于多源数据的成都市旅游资源评价及空间格局研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2017

[6] Mariani M, Di F G, Di F M. Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Services by Leveraging Big Data:The Role of Services Attributes and Consumers’ Cultural Background[J].IEEE Access, 2018(1):8 195-8 208

[7]潘立新,吴俏,刘晓莉,等.基于大数据的游客情感满意度研究——以芜湖方特为例[J].宿州学院学报,2020,35(1):6-11

[8] Raun J, Ahas R, Tiru M. Measuring Tourism Destinations Using Mobile Tracking Data[J]. Tourism Management, 2016(57):202-212

[9]戢晓峰,戈艺澄,陈方.基于公路交通流大数据的节假日旅游流时空分异特征——以云南省2017年7个节假日为例[J].旅游学刊,2019,34(6):37-47

[10]李世涛.应用层次分析法对深圳海岸带旅游资源进行定量评价[J].商场现代化,2007(18):171-172

[11]任艳艳.深圳大鹏半岛风景旅游资源评价与建设可行性分析[J].绿色科技,2019(19):255-257

[12]伍百军.非物质文化遗产旅游资源评价体系构建的实证研究——以广东云浮为例[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,36(2):26-32

[13]舒惠芳,李萍,江玲.基于GIS的深圳旅游资源评价与区划[J].热带地理,2010,30(2):205-209

[14]叶伸,王秀云,王欣.基于GIS的黄山市生态文明旅游发展研究[J].河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2016,32(7):49-55

[15]杨雯,刘洪利,赵文吉.基于GIS的延庆县村镇民俗旅游资源评价、分析与规划研究[J].测绘科学,2010,35(3):129-131

基本信息:

中图分类号:F592.7;P208

引用信息:

[1]陈志云,刘敏纯,钟广锐,等.基于多源数据的梅州市旅游资源综合评价分析[J].地理空间信息,2021,19(04):51-55+7.

基金信息:

广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD19CGL36); 梅州市科技局与嘉应学院联合重点项目(2013KJZ08); 嘉应学院大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S201910582084)

发布时间:

2021-04-28

出版时间:

2021-04-28

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文