nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.24 10-15+36
基于知识图谱分析的城市公共空间评估研究进展
基金项目(Foundation): 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2024JJ8324); 湖南省自然资源厅重大科技研究项目(20240104GH)
邮箱(Email): pengjiajieab@126.com;
DOI:
摘要:

存量时代与高质量发展背景下围绕人的需求对城市公共空间进行多维度评估和规划设计响应已成为当前的重要议题。基于知识图谱对城市公共空间评估研究的热点国家、核心机构、主要作者、热点主题和演化趋势进行可视化分析,得出以下特征:(1)国内外相关文献数量总体呈现上升态势;(2)国际上,该领域研究视角更为多元,机构合作强度也较高,国内主要研究机构均为高校,在国内外合作与跨学科深度研究方面有待加强;(3)国内外研究热点均出现在国土空间规划改革后,国际评估维度主要聚焦在可达性与满意度、舒适度、风险和效能评估;国内则集中在公共性与可达性、品质与活力、供需关系和公共安全等维度;(4)演化趋势方面,在多元大数据的支撑下,评估维度与内容更加丰富,评估对象更加细分;在科学与技术发展的支撑下,评估方法更加多元,模型工具趋于智慧化。最后对我国城市公共空间评估研究提出建议,旨在为城市公共空间系统化协同评估提供参考。

Abstract:

Under the dual contexts of the urban stock development and high-quality development, conducting multi-dimensional evaluations and responsive planning for public spaces, centered on human needs, has emerged as a critical research focus in contemporary urban studies. We used knowledge graph to conduct visual analysis for the leading countries, core institutions, prominent authors, key thematic areas, and evolutionary trends in the urban public space evaluation research. The results show that(1)the publication volumes of relevant literature in both domestic and international contexts have exhibited a sustained upward trajectory.(2) International research in this field exhibits diversified perspectives and stronger institutional collaboration strength. In China, the primary research institutions are mainly higher education institutions, while comparative analysis reveals the areas requiring enhancement in domestic-international collaboration and interdisciplinary depth.(3)Research hotspots in both domestic and international contexts have emerged following the territorial spatial planning reform. International studies predominantly focus on accessibility, satisfaction, comfort, risk, and performance evaluation, while domestic studies concentrate on publicness, accessibility, quality and vitality, supply-demand relationships, and public safety.(4) Regarding evolutionary trends, evaluation frameworks have expanded in both scope and granularity, propelled by multi-source big data, while evaluation objects have become increasingly segmented and refined. Simultaneously, methodological diversification and intelligent modeling tools have emerged, facilitated by advancements in scientific and technological innovation. Finally, we offered recommendations for urban public space evaluation research in China, aiming to serve as a reference for systematic and collaborative evaluation of urban public spaces.

参考文献

[1]Wang K,Sun Z,Cai M,et al. Impacts of Urban Blue-green Space on Residents'Health:A Bibliometric Review[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(23):16192

[2]刘寒寒,叶菁,王雯雯.基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer的国内半城市化研究可视化分析[J].热带地理,2022,42(5):788-798

[3]Chen C M,Hu Z G,Liu S B,et al. Emerging Trends In Re-generative Medicine:a Scientometric Analysis in CiteSpace[J]. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy,2012,12(5):593-608

[4]陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253

[5]王俊帝,刘志强,邵大伟,等.基于CiteSpace的国外城市绿地研究进展的知识图谱分析[J].中国园林,2018,33(4):5-11

[6]姚强,安纳,李纯,等.城市土地成片开发研究的特征、进展与趋势:基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer的文献计量分析[J].现代城市研究,2024,38(6):52-61

[7]Wen W,Yi Q W. Evaluation and Promotion of the Service Capacity of Urban Public Open Spaces Based on Improving Accessibility:A Case Study of Shenyang City,China[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2021,31(6):1045-1056

[8]Wang M,Pei X,Zhang M,et al. Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Public Space Accessibility for Residents’Satisfaction:A Case Study of Nanshan District,Shenzhen City[J]. Buildings,2023,13(10):2624

[9]Song Y,Wang Y,Zhou M. Public Space Satisfaction Evaluation of New Centralized Communities in Urban Fringe Areas:A Study of Suzhou,China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2023,20(1):753

[10]Wei S,Jiao W,Liu H,et al. Research on Comfort Evaluation Model of Urban Resident’Public Space Lighting Integrating Public Perception and Nighttime Light Remote Sensing Data[J]. Remote Sensing,2022,14(3):655

[11]Yang W,Kang J. Acoustic Comfort Evaluation in Urban Open Public Spaces[J]. Applied Acoustics,2005,2(19):211-229

[12]Cao J,Kang J. The Influence of Companion Factors on Ssoundscape Evaluations in Uurban Public Spaces[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2021(9):69-102

[13]Ma C X,Peng F L,Qiao Y K,et al. Evaluation of Spatia lPerformance of Metro-led Urban Underground Public Space:A Case Study in Shanghai[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2022(6):124

[14]Li X,Li L,Lin M,et al. Research on Risk and Resilience Evaluation of Urban Underground Public Space[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(23):15897

[15]徐宁.多学科视角下的城市公共空间研究综述[J].风景园林,2021,28(4):52-57

[16]叶伸,郑德华,陈兵,等.基于服务半径的城市公园绿地空间可达性研究[J].地理空间信息,2020,18(4):65-69

[17]段松江,丁忆,胡艳,等.基于两步移动搜索法的公园绿地可达性研究[J].地理空间信息,2019,17(8):40-42

[18]王一名,陈洁.国外城市空间公共性评价研究及其对中国的借鉴和启示[J].城市规划学刊,2016,59(6):21-32

[19]吴汶优.公园城市背景下城市绿地空间公共性评估模型研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2020

[20]张婧雯.高密度城市立体化公共空间公共性研究[D].深圳:深圳大学,2019

[21]林威.高密度背景下的城市屋顶开放空间公共性评估研究[D].深圳:深圳大学,2022

[22]马亮.三峡库区城市公共游憩空间的公共性评估及优化研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2022

[23]席倩颖,吴建楠.基于PSPL调查法的城市公共空间品质评估:以厦门市世贸商场区域为例[J].中外建筑,2021,26(1):69-74

[24]蔡双,丁素红.基于使用后评估的安置社区公共空间更新策略研究:以成都市凤凰大道同福苑社区为例[J].住区,2022,24(1):21-31

[25]王新宇,李彦,李伟健,等.城市更新视角下的公共空间品质评估方法:基于移动感知技术的探索[J].国际城市规划,2024,39(1):21-29

[26]成实,苏子玥,张冠亭.以观山体验为导向的山地丘陵型城市公共空间评估与优化策略研究:以南京市为例[J].中国园林,2023,39(3):60-65

[27]于晴,田宇,吴昌广.基于时空动态的公共空间热舒适评价方法研究[C]//中国城市规划学会.人民城市,规划赋能:2022中国城市规划年会论文集(08城市生态规划),2022

[28]汪海,蒋涤非.城市公共空间活力评价体系研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2012,9(1):56-60

[29]唐凤玲,姚静怡,邓紫晗,等.基于PLPS调研的建成环境对街道活力的影响评估:以南京市广州路段为例[C]//中国城市规划学会,杭州市人民政府.共享与品质:2018中国城市规划年会论文集(07城市设计).南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,2018

[30]彭丽.城市社区公共空间活力评价指标体系研究[D].成都:四川大学,2023

[31]韦伯斯特,张播,李晶晶.产权、公共空间和城市设计[J].国际城市规划,2008,29(6):3-12

[32]Magalh??es C D. Public Space and the Contracting Out of Publicness:A Framework for Analysis[J]. Journal of Urban Design,2010(4):559-574

[33]董嘉维.基于卷积神经网络技术的城市公共空间评价体系研究[D].苏州:苏州科技大学,2020

[34]朱常丽,何浩,杜星宇,等.武汉城市公共空间评估指标体系构建研究[J].规划师,2021,37(增刊):117-121

[35]王淳淳,金云峰.静态空间与实际访问的城市公共绿地公平对比评估[J].智能城市,2024,10(6):1-3

[36]王思懿,付瑶.基于PSQAT评估工具的儿童户外游戏空间研究:以沈阳为例[J].华中建筑,2024,42(5):1-5

[37]李俊桥.基于数据交叉算法的城市公共空间评估分析[J].城市建筑,2024,21(19):157-159

[38]赵莹,关可汗,宋兆伟.长春市公园绿地供需服务水平与可达性分析[J].地理空间信息,2024,22(7):18-21

基本信息:

中图分类号:TU984.113;G353.1

引用信息:

[1]耿鹤,唐凯,乔雅楠,等.基于知识图谱分析的城市公共空间评估研究进展[J].地理空间信息,2026,24(02):10-15+36.

基金信息:

湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2024JJ8324); 湖南省自然资源厅重大科技研究项目(20240104GH)

发布时间:

2026-02-27

出版时间:

2026-02-27

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文